Let Hyde Park vote on the McMobil Project

To the Editor:

Thank you to everybody who attended the Chicago Plan Commission meeting on May 16, wrote letters to the commission or spoke at the meeting. If nothing else the commission and developer have gotten the idea that there is a lot of opposition to McMobil. This is not over.

Apologists for McMobil talk as if Hyde Park is about to strike oil.

The claims of economic benefits of McMobil are dubious and not backed up by facts. There should be an objective forecast of the economic benefits of McMobil by an organization experienced in doing such forecasts for communities and checking the accuracy of their predictions years later. Meanwhile the McMobil apologists should stop making exaggerated claims.

Hyde Park is home to about 35,000 people. If McMobil is built, about 500 people will occupy the 270 apartments. That is about 1 1/2 percent of the population of Hyde Park. They should increase spending by about 1 1/2 percent. Big deal. That is a minimal economic benefit.

There should be a complete and impartial shadow study and traffic and parking study.
About “filling in the gap in the smile,” that assumes that 53rd Street is full of 13-story buildings all the way to Kimbark Avenue. It’s not. McMobil would fill in the gap with a gold tooth. There could be a four- or five-story building to fill in the gap.

To me McMobil looks like a kid with a Lego set has gone wild.

Wonder why so many people don’t go to public meetings? The May 7 TIF meeting was controlled by the developers and their allies. It was more of an advertisement than an honest discussion of the pros and cons of McMobil. Ald. Will Burns (4th) stood at the back, hiding behind a taller member of support staff. At the March 18 meeting at the Augustana Lutheran Church, Ald. Burns stayed in the lobby and wouldn’t come in to talk to the meeting.

There should be an advisory referendum where Hyde Park residents can vote on McMobil. The city’s decision on McMobil should be put on hold until after the advisory referendum.

Mark Graham