Letters to the Editor

Runners need to be mindful of walkers

To the Editor:

Does the Hyde Park community realize that the proliferation of joggers on sidewalks has become a safety hazard? Yes. Ask a local resident about leaving a store and almost being run down by a guy or gal in short  shorts. It has become a very common occurrence.

When stepping out of a business or residence on certain streets, a pedestrian should always look both ways before stepping outside. Some of these runners have no regard for the natural pedestrian, someone who is walking on a sidewalk. While this may not be true of the entire running community in Hyde Park, once again, a few bad apples ruin it for the  bunch. Hopefully, these runners will stop barreling down on people with a little encouraging. In the meantime, keep your head up Hyde Park pedestrians!

Greg Fairbanks

The 4th on 53rd parade needs you!

To the Editor:

As we embark on the 24th year of the 4th on 53rd Community Parade and Picnic, we wish to express our sincere appreciation for all the community support the 4th receives. To SECC, the Chamber of Commerce and the Hyde Park Herald especially, who are unfailingly generous with both time and money; to our donors who provide the financial support, which enables us to stage the event, and most of all to the volunteers, without whom this event could not happen, we are deeply grateful.

As of now, we are beginning to plan for the 2015 4th on 53rd. The Committee needs a few more people to assist with specific jobs as Park or Parade assistants, and many more, who will commit to volunteer their time on the day of the 4th. Please contact me by the phone (773-955-3622), or our PR Chair Kirsten Srinivasan by e-mail at kirstensri@gmail.com.

Stephanie Franklin, Event Chair
4th on 53rd Committee

No blank check for Obama Library site

To the Editor:

Of what value is a public trust doctrine? We park preservationists have long believed that the public park system belongs to all of us — no one person or another has the right to parcel out pieces of open park land. The presidential museum is a private enterprise. You would think that the president would set a good example. Join stewards of the open parks and take responsibility for safeguarding open park land, instead of taking advantage of privilege.

When a representative of the University of Chicago stated that the presidential museum is not built on parkland then it will go to New York. The response by Phil Rosenthal was, “Really?”

Katie Newhouse

Library in park not Obama-like

To the Editor:

Though I want the Obama Library to be on the South Side, I definitely do not accept placing it on park property. Park property is sacrosanct. Park property is for the people of Chicago to use unimpeded by any person who is to be honored. I do not care if it is George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Martin Luther King or personalities of our religions such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Mohammed or the Buddha. Or for that matter any of our numerous great foremothers and forefathers of any religion or race.

That land needs to remain open, and unobstructed by man-made buildings. President Barack Obama is indeed a great person who is remarkable for what he has accomplished. In one of his better moments he would agree with me.

Alfred D. Klinger

Christian Mitchell is the real thing

To the Editor:

Earlier this month, I and many other seniors at Mary Jane Richardson apartments had the great pleasure of spending an afternoon with state Rep. Christian Mitchell (D-26).

I’m writing because I was so struck by what Christian did for us that day. He came to us. He brought services that seniors need to us. And this wasn’t just a quick stop, take a picture and leave. This was a whole afternoon where he gave his complete attention to each individual, listened to us and shared with us what he’s fighting for down in Springfield, Ill.

This is a young man who is truly a leader for our community. Many of us are grandparents, and to see someone who reminded us of our own grandchildren doing such great things for our community was a blessing and an absolute joy. I told Christian that day that he added years to our lives just by taking the time out of his schedule to be in our home.

He told us about the struggles of being raised by his grandparents and caring for a sick mother. He told us about boxing and how it kept him out of trouble as a young kid. I know deep down that he’s one of us — someone who is committed and dedicated to making the world a better place.

We’re used to politicians who only come around when they want our vote. But Christian came when he didn’t need to. When it really was just about us.

As a senior who has been around for quite a while, I couldn’t be prouder of the young man I’ve watched Christian become.

Adell Davis

DuSable museum applauds foundation’s site choice

Editor’s note: The following letter was sent to the Barack Obama Foundation.

Dear Sirs:

Since it is “now official,” the Board of Trustees and staff of the DuSable Museum of African American History are writing this letter to express our delight, support and enthusiasm for having the Obama Presidential Library take its rightful place on Chicago’s Historic South Side.

Since presidential libraries are not libraries in the traditional sense, but repositories of specific times in history, it is only fitting that the Obama Presidential Library share time and space with the DuSable Museum of African American History, our nation’s oldest repository of the history and culture of Africans and Americans of African descent. Having the library of the nation’s first African American President as a neighbor of the nation’s first African American Museum has the potential to transform the South Side of Chicago into not only our city’s top tourist destination, but also one of the top destinations in the United States.

With the addition of the Obama Presidential Library, historians and scholars will be able to study not only the history of the first African American President through his papers and objects: The DuSable Museum’s vast archives will also afford those same historians and scholars the opportunity to study the history of the African American community.

We welcome the Obama Presidential Library and promise to do all we can to make this living tribute to the nation’s first African American President an institution the entire world will be proud of and one his legacy will reflect.

Robert D. Blackwell Sr.
President and CEO
The DuSable Museum of African American History

Muddled messages on UCPD issues

To the Editor:

As someone who has been very much involved in the debate over community policing, I welcome the attention given to this issue, in particular, on these pages, from journalist Jamie Kalven, and my alderman, Will Burns (4th). I’m not quite sure I understand the points they are attempting to make in regards to it.

On May 6, Mr. Kalven wrote a very detailed letter criticizing the recently passed House Bill 3932 for not going far enough in subjecting private university and college police forces to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. However, just a couple of weeks ago, he was effusing praise on the University of Chicago for its voluntary efforts to release information that in many cases is already public. The University of Chicago was also much less clear and transparent in what they would be releasing on their soon-to-be-revamped website. While his points may have merit, let’s keep in mind that it should not be part of UCPD’s mission — or that of any other private university or college —to police the community. Aside from that, gaining recourse and potential relief through the courts, and an arbiter in the state Attorney General, should be huge plusses to a journalist who has used these same avenues to prevail in his attempts to gain access to information from public police forces. A better solution, Mr. Kalven, is to not have UCPD police the community at all, because it is a private entity, and we are never going to perfect its role in public policing.

In his letter, Alderman Burns brings up the point of good and bad cops. UCPD is a department that has approximately 100 sworn officers. In 2013, UCPD performed traffic stops on over 12,000 citizens, about 120 per sworn officer, within a 50,000-population jurisdiction. UCPD’s jurisdiction encompassed a large chunk of the 4th Ward in 2013. By contrast, the City of Chicago’s police department, with just more than 12,000 sworn officers, performed about 100,000 traffic stops, or about 8 persons per sworn officer, within a 2,700,000-population jurisdiction. In CPD’s case, roughly six of those eight persons stopped were minority. In UCPD’s case, 96 of the 120 were minority. Respectfully, Ald. Burns, we don’t have a “handful who violate that trust” issue. These numbers, and your community, appear to be saying much, much more than that. Introducing the “good cop/bad cop” issue does nothing in my opinion to address this disparity, let alone inform us of who the good and bad cops are. I understand your concerns about our relationship with law enforcement, but the numbers above should never be the price we pay for that relationship.

Roderick Sawyer

Police deserve our respect

To the Editor:

For 25 years, my father served as a police officer. His dedication to public service is one of the reasons why I chose public service as well. My father didn’t talk much about his work, except to point out how difficult it was, and potentially dangerous. I suspect that his reticence was based in a sense that as civilians we could not fully grasp what being a police officer is really like. Maybe he didn’t talk about his experiences because he didn’t want us to worry about his safety.

Whenever I meet a police officer I remember my father and it makes me appreciate the work they do.

As this neighborhood examines the relationship between police and the community, I think that we must take into consideration that most police officers are motivated to serve the public and that the handful who violate that trust are the exception and not the rule.

I am grateful to the Chicago Police Department and the University of Chicago Police Department for responding to thousands of calls for service. Their responsiveness is critical to our public safety, and our community.

Ald. Will Burns (4th)

Another cost from oil addiction

To the Editor:

I often awaken at between 3 and 4 in the morning to hear rumbling in the distance. It turns out that rumbling is the wheels of railroad cars on the tracks. It goes on for hours.

The Chicago Tribune disclosed what is behind this foreboding noise. These BNSF Railway trains with 103 tank cars filled with Bakken shale crude oil are passing through the city and suburbs from North Dakota to East Coast refineries. This crude oil is hightly explosive.

Catastrophic explosions have already taken place in Quebec and close to Galena, Ill. The one in Canada resulted in enormous damage to structures as well as the death of 47 people. Can you imagine what would happen if there were an explosion on a roadway where the Metra tracks are? I live only a block and half away. Thousands are even closer.

For my money, the entire neighborhood is in danger of a catastrophe because of our continuous dependence on oil for our main source of energy. One of the immediate solutions is to reroute these trains out of the city and other populous areas. The longer term solution is to turn to other less destructive, lethal, earth and air polluting sources of energy.

Alfred Klinger

Housing project’s fundraising success

To the Editor:

The Hyde Park Transitional Housing Project’s (HPTHP) major annual fundraising event, the Taste of Hyde Park, was held on April 18 and was again a success, raising approximately $8,000 after expenses. A hundred friends of HPTHP enjoyed the opportunity to sample food from 23 area restaurants and other food and drink establishments, while socializing and being entertained by the piano artistry of Willie Pickens. The event was hosted by the Church of St. Paul and the Redeemer.

Special thanks goes to the corporate sponsors of the event: Hyde Park Bank, Rockefeller Memorial Chapel and the United Church of Hyde Park.

The restaurants donating food were identified at their serving stations so the guests would know where they could find more of what they enjoyed. The contributing establishments included in alphabetical order: Bar Louie, Bergstein’s NY Deli, Cedar’s Mediterranean Kitchen, Cholie’s Pizza, Clarke’s, De Rice, Fabiana’s Bakery, Hyde Park Produce Market, Jimmy John’s, Kimbark Beverage Shoppe, Maravillas, Medici on 57th, Mellow yellow, Nicky’s Chinese Food, Pho 55, Rajun Cajun, Red Snapper, Seven Ten Lanes, Siam Restaurant, The Snail, Thai 55, The Sit Down Cafe and Valois. The food was delicious and if you get a chance to visit any of these establishments you’ll enjoy them too.

Along with the great food and music, the Taste of Hyde Park included a silent auction on 30 items, mainly personal services, gift certificates and tickets donated by local businesses and artisans. We thank all those who donated items and congratulate those who won the items with the highest bid.

Finally, thanks are also due to the members of the HPTHP board who contributed their time and energies to make this event a success and to the numerous others whose volunteer work made the event run smoothly.

Jerry Gripshover
Chair, Taste of Hyde Park

Campus police bill dangerously flawed

To the Editor:

On April 24, the Illinois House unanimously passed a bill — HB 3932 — that would establish transparency standards under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act for private campus police forces. Introduced by state Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie (D-25) and co-sponsored by state Rep. Christian Mitchell (D-26), the bill was drafted in response to community and student calls for greater transparency on the part of the University of Chicago Police Department. The Senate will now consider the bill.

The original purpose of this legislation was to establish the principle that a private entity performing a public function — in this case law enforcement — is subject to the same standards of transparency as the public agency from which it derives its powers. As originally drafted, HB 3932 would have accomplished that end. As amended, it does not. On the contrary, it would have the effect of shielding campus police from transparency standards that apply to all other police officers in the state.

There are several areas of concern:

(1) The bill exempts all disciplinary records from disclosure to the public, except in instances in which the records relate to a case in which a campus police officer was disciplined. It thus distinguishes between founded and unfounded complaints. That distinction has been explicitly and repeatedly rejected by Illinois courts. In Gekas v. Williamson, the Illinois Court of Appeals observed that citizens have a “duty” under FOIA to monitor public institutions to ensure they are “being conducted in the public interest.” In discharging that duty, the court wrote, citizens might want to see whether the police department is “performing fair and objective investigation of complaints” by assessing whether complaints “determined to be unfounded are really unfounded.” It went on to reject the argument that unfounded complaints are not public information:

“Obviously, citizens cannot perform this critique . . . if so-called ‘unfounded’ complaints are exempt from disclosure for the tautological reason that the public body decided they were unfounded. Such an exemption would throw a cloak over potential wrongdoing and insulate officials from political accountability.”

In light of the principle articulated by the Gekas court, what conceivable rationale is there for exempting campus police officers from the transparency standards applicable to all other police officers in the state?

(2) The essence of FOIA is the power to compel compliance. Yet HB 3932 is ambiguous regarding judicial review of FOIA denials. An earlier version of the bill contained strong, clear language to the effect that anyone who felt they had been wrongly denied access to public information by a campus police department “may file suit for injunctive or declaratory relief in the circuit court for the county where the campus police department is located.” It also provided for civil penalties in instances when a campus police department was found to have “willfully and intentionally failed to comply.” The current version of the bill lays out a process of review by the Public Access Counselor in the Office of the Attorney General. It is, however, largely silent about the right to judicial review. Speaking as one who has repeatedly found it necessary to sue the Chicago Police Department in order to access public information, that silence is unnerving. Why was the language about judicial review in the earlier version of the bill deleted?

(3) The bill provides that all “records relating to students and related disciplinary proceedings and actions” are exempt. While I recognize there may be instances in which such records might legitimately be withheld, it is also possible to imagine situations in which they would be of compelling public interest. Surely we can expect greater precision in legislative draftsmanship that this sweeping categorical exemption.

(4) Finally, the bill provides that all “records, tapes, and other digital media from campus security cameras” are exempt from disclosure. At a time when videotapes of various sorts figure centrally in public debate about police accountability, this language again sweeps too broadly. What is the rationale for withholding all such information from the public?

The legislation introduced by Reps. Currie and Mitchell continues to hold great promise, but only if the flaws described above are addressed. If they are not, HB 3932 will be a step backward rather than forward.

Jamie Kalven

We need proper lighting on 57th St.

To the Editor:

The article “More lighting, new signage on 57th Street approved by majority in new survey” failed to account for the opinions held by many of the residents near the proposed 57th Street improvements. At the public meeting it was in general agreement that the limited South East Chicago Commission funding would be welcomed for items like banners, landscaping and way-finding signs.
What was not in general agreement was more lighting. When the survey respondents indicated that they wanted more lighting, what they were actually looking for is higher quality lighting – that is, lighting designed to light the streets, sidewalks and viaduct without wasting light, energy and money up and sideways and into residents’ bedrooms. The limited options for pedestrian lighting presented failed to do so and lacked any good details about their implementation onto the very mixed-use street that is 57th Street.

What works in downtown Chicago and Harper Court will not work on blocks of residences and small businesses. While it is understandable that this funding is for improvements, it highlights deeper concerns of sidewalk maintenance, street surface, drainage and infrastructure that do not match the character of 57th Street and its connection between the Museum of Science and Industry and the University of Chicago. We look forward to improvements that are real improvements.

Dean W. Armstrong

Make sure Vue53 keeps parking promise

To the Editor:

It was not surprising to see that the city is taking care of MAC Property Management by providing two parking spaces on Kenwood Avenue for its use for valet parking during the construction of Vue53 (Herald, 4/15/2015). Isn’t it good to see that the parking impacts of Vue53 are being ameliorated for one of the project’s proponents?

One would hope that the city will similarly take care of the neighborhood by enforcing the parking promises made by the university and its developer, Mesa, in order to obtain the re-zoning that makes the project possible. In applying for the re-zoning, the university and Mesa submitted the report of their traffic consultant, KLOA. The KLOA report stated that Vue53 would provide more than the 200 parking spaces needed, under city zoning regulations, for the residential component of this project.

The university and Mesa should live up to their promise – made through their consultant – to provide at least 200 parking spaces for Vue53 residents. The city should be expected to monitor the compliance of the university and Mesa with their promise.

Marc Lipinski

Strive thanks Hyde Park for helping hand

To the Editor:

On behalf of Strive Tutoring, I offer my sincere appreciation for your support of Strive’s April 11 Spring Benefit. In particular, I would like to acknowledge Hyde Park Bank for their partnership and hospitality; and Hyatt Place Chicago-South/University Medical Center, Kenwood Liquors, Lagunitas Brewing Company, Pizza Capri, Piccolo Mondo, Uncle Joe’s, Hyde Park Produce and the other local businesses that donated in-kind goods to our event. Your support matters.

Friends and neighbors, please frequent the local businesses that help to sustain valuable community programs like Strive. It takes a village!

Angela Paranjape
Executive Director
Strive Tutoring

UCPD announcement a modest step

To the Editor:

Last week, I received an email from the University of Chicago’s Office of Civic Engagement (OCE) announcing that it would began publicizing the university’s policing information on its website. I was thoroughly underwhelmed. Then I began reading news accounts of praises from various community activists, journalists and professors as to what a watershed moment this was, and I was completely flabbergasted. I saw nothing in the email from OCE VP Derek Douglas or UCPD Chief Marlon Lynch that indicated any more openness or transparency than prior to the email. It was good PR, but very little else.

In fact, this announcement appears to be an attempt aimed at blunting proposed legislation to add a Freedom of Information component (HB 3932) to the Private College Campus Police Act (PCCPA – 110 ILCS 1020/1).

In the email, the university states that it “will streamline online access to law enforcement information that is already public.” In regards to traffic stop information, collection of such data by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) is mandated by law (625 ILCS 5/11-212). All Illinois police departments, including university police forces, are required to record and report traffic stop information. Without the aid of a Freedom of Information request, I was able to compile data comparing UCPD to a university with a similarly structured police force, Northwestern University. The stops are listed by year and race, with totals (percentages):

University of Chicago PD:
2013 – White 2,268 (18.72 percent), Minority 9,846 (81.28 percent)
2012 – White 1,456 (17.73 percent), Minority 6,758 (82.27 percent)

Northwestern University PD:
2013 – White 380 (58.19 percent), Minority 273 (41.81 percent)
2012 – White 479 (55.76 percent), Minority 380 (44.24 percent)

U. of C.’s campus serves a little more than 16,000 students on 217 acres. Northwestern serves 21,000 on 240 acres. The difference in traffic stops, in both number and percentage of minority stops, are breathtakingly different. For a comparison, I also included the police departments of the cities in which both are located:

City of Chicago PD:
2013 – White 27,311 (27.13 percent), Minority 73,347 (72.87 percent)
2012 – White 32,851 (28.38 percent), Minority 82,908 (71.62 percent)

City of Evanston PD:
2013 – White 6,123 (55.19 percent), Minority 4,972 (44.81 percent)
2012 – White 7,454 (54.61 percent), Minority 6,196 (45.39 percent)

In 2013, the last year of available data, UCPD made more traffic stops than Northwestern and Evanston combined. The minority stop percentage is almost twice as large. In addition, UCPD’s minority stop total numbered more than 13 percent of the total stops Chicago reported, and its minority stop percentage was almost 10 points higher. Given that UCPD’s patrol jurisdiction is roughly half of Evanston’s, you have to wonder just what their primary police function is.

The email also states “the changes go beyond the requirements of Illinois law for police forces at private institutions.” PCCPA makes no mention of reporting of any kind. The mere existence of U. of C.’s website in any form, as it relates to UCPD, goes beyond Illinois law.

In a final point, “the University will provide and publicize additional background information related to current UCPD practices…” It’s hard to say that the university will provide any more information than what other private universities, such as Northwestern, Bradley, Illinois Benedictine and Milikin University, already provide on their websites. They all specifically refer to the PCCPA, and their powers derived from it. U. of C. would only be playing catch up.

The point of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is the ability to request from an entity performing public function information that is not ordinarily or readily available to the public. What a FOIA also adds is an arbiter, the Illinois Attorney General, for when a request is refused.

The university can continue to work on its website while we continue our work on laws, like FOIA, that will make these police forces accountable and open. And the activists, professors and journalists need to hold their applause until these laws are in effect.

Roderick Sawyer